The Deputy Attorney General and Minister for Justice, Dr. Srem-Sai has announced that the ECOWAS Community Court in Abuja has dismissed former Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo’s application seeking interim measures to stop the work of the committee that investigated her removal from office.
Also Read
In a facebook post, the Deputy AG said “The Court stated that the application did not satisfy the criteria for a grant of interim measures. More particularly, the Court held that:
“The Applicant’s own conduct defeats her claim of imminent and irreparable harm. The Court is, therefore, satisfied that the Applicant has not demonstrated the existence of imminent or exceptional circumstance that will justify the urgency of the application filed almost 3 months after the act complained of.
In the light of the Applicant’s failure to meet the requirement of urgency, the Court finds no basis to assess the remaining criteria for provisional measures, same being cumulative. The request for provisional measures as outlined by the Applicant, same not substantiated, is therefore dismissed.”
The court delivered the ruling today, Wednesday, November 19, 2025, following the former CJ’s application for temporary prohibition orders to stop the committee, chaired by Justice Gabriel Scott Pwamang, from continuing its inquiry into matters that led to her removal and the swearing-in of her successor, Chief Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie.
While the ECOWAS Court acknowledged that the former Chief Justice had established a prima facie case alleging human rights violations, it ruled that she failed to demonstrate the urgency required for temporary orders. The judges noted that she waited nearly three months after her suspension on April 22, 2025, before filing the motion—a delay that undermined her claim of imminent harm.
In addition, the Court rejected a preliminary objection from the Government of Ghana, which argued that it lacked jurisdiction because related issues were before Ghanaian courts.
The judges described the objection as “misplaced,” clarifying that the sub judice principle applies only when a matter is awaiting judgment elsewhere, not merely because cases share similar facts.
The main application was declared admissible, and the Attorney General has been directed to file a response.
