Alleged internal memo nails Ayine over Johnson Asiama case withdrawal

A recent revelation by Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Dr. Dominic Ayine, has sparked controversy in the case involving Dr. Johnson Pundit Asiama and some distressed banks.

According to Dr. Ayine, he relied on an internal memo from the Prosecutions Division to discontinue the case against Dr. Asiama.

However, a forensic investigation has raised questions about the authenticity and legitimacy of the alleged internal memo.

The investigation revealed that the document cited by Dr. Ayine was undated, unsigned, and unminuted. This has led to concerns about the Attorney-General’s decision to rely on such a document to discontinue the case.

The investigation has also raised questions about the practices and procedures within the Office of the Attorney-General, particularly with regards to the handling of internal memos.

Dr. Ayine’s decision to discontinue the case against Dr. Asiama was based on his review of the case files, which he claimed revealed “fatal flaws” in the prosecution’s case.

However, the investigation has cast doubt on the legitimacy of the alleged internal memo, which has been cited as the basis for Dr. Ayine’s decision.

The controversy surrounding the alleged internal memo has sparked a heated debate about the integrity of the Attorney-General’s office and the handling of high-profile cases.

The investigation has also raised questions about the role of the Prosecutions Division and the procedures for handling internal memos.

As the controversy continues to unfold, many are calling for greater transparency and accountability within the Attorney-General’s office. The investigation has highlighted the need for a thorough review of the procedures and practices within the office, particularly with regards to the handling of internal memos and high-profile cases.

The case against Dr. Asiama was one of several high-profile cases that were discontinued by Dr. Ayine.
The investigation has raised questions about the basis for these decisions and the role of the Prosecutions Division in advising the Attorney-General.